You will be redirected to the page you want to view in  seconds.

Ground Combat Vehicle development delayed

Jan. 17, 2013 - 03:16PM   |   Last Updated: Jan. 17, 2013 - 03:16PM  |  
  • Filed Under

The Army is delaying its next-generation Ground Combat Vehicle program by extending the technology development (TD) phase by six months, according to a memo obtained by Defense News.

The Army also plans to award an engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) contract to a single vendor as opposed to the previously planned two vendors in late fiscal 2014, the letter said.

A">Jan. 17 memo (PDF) from the Pentagon's head of acquisition, logistics and technology to the Army secretary states that the changes are being made "in anticipation of the fiscal pressures over the FY14-18 timeframe," and "the need for additional development time led to this restructured program."

By moving the program's schedule back by six months, a final production decision is now expected some time in fiscal 2019 as opposed to the expected first quarter of fiscal 2018.

The TD phase of the program kicked off in August 2011 with the awarding of contracts to BAE Systems for $449 million and General Dynamics Land Systems for $439 million for continued work on the program.

The official start date for the planned 24-month phase actually was pushed back until December 2011 thanks to a protest filed by a Boeing-SAIC team, which was shut out of the competition. The Ground Combat Vehicle program received the full $639 million the Army requested in the 2013 defense budget.

While no numbers are yet available, the changes in the schedule and make-up of the program will most certainly affect its overall price tag.

The memo notes that the Army will be expected to provide an "updated acquisition strategy, acquisition program baseline, and revised cost estimate" to support the planned EMD decision. The Army will also be required to obtain Defense Acquisition Board approval before releasing the EMD request for proposal, which is slated to hit the street during the first quarter of fiscal 2014.

Competitors BAE Systems and General Dynamics did not respond to requests for comment. An Army spokesman said that the service would issue a press release later Jan. 17.

Plans for the GCV call for 1,894 vehicles, but budget issues and the Army's shift from large-scale combat operations have called that requirement into question.

The overall cost per vehicle has also been a matter of debate, with the service claiming that the average unit production cost for the GCV will fall in the $9 million to $10.5 million range. The Pentagon's Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation disputes those figures, estimating that the average production cost will instead likely be $16 million to $17 million range.

Answers by RallyPoint

Join trending discussions in the military's #1 professional community. See what members like yourself have to say from across the DoD.

More In News

Start your day with a roundup of top defense news.

VA Home Loan

Search By:

Product Options:
Zip Code:

News for your in-box

Sign up now for free Military Times E-Reports. Choose from Money and Education. Subscribers: log in for premium e-newsletters.

This Week's Army Times

This Week's Army Times

CrossFit vs. unit PT
Troops will do the training plans in a $2.5 million study

Subscribe for Print or Digital delivery today!

MilitaryTimes Green Trusted Classifieds Looking to buy, sell and connect on Military Times?
Browse expanded listings across hundreds of military installations.
Faces of valorHonoring those who fought and died in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom.
hall of valorThe Hall of Valor is a searchable database of valor award citations collected by Doug Sterner, a Vietnam veteran and Military Times contributing editor, and by Military Times staff.

All you need to know about your military benefits.

Benefits handbook

Guard & Reserve All you need to know about the Guard & Reserve.

guard and reserve handbook